Details about package emacs-cmake-mode
Package uploads
Upload #2
Information
Changelog
emacs-cmake-mode (3.31.4+ds-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream version 3.31.4+ds
* Fix field name typo in debian/copyright (Comments ⇒ Comment).
* Update Standards-Version to 4.7.0; no change needed
* Add d/gbp.conf matching the current practice
* Add myself to Uploaders in d/control
Comments
No comments
Upload #1
Information
Changelog
emacs-cmake-mode (3.31.2+ds-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream version 3.31.2+ds
* Fix field name typo in debian/copyright (Comments ⇒ Comment).
* Update Standards-Version to 4.7.0; no change needed
* Add d/gbp.conf matching the current practice
* Add myself to Uploaders in d/control
Comments
-
Xiyue,
Preamble...
Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project.
This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review.
Review...
1. Build:
* pbuilder [1]: Good
* sbuild [2]: Good
2. Lintian [3]: Good
3. Licenses [4]: Good
4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Issue
philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/emacs-cmake-mode-3.31.2+ds$ uscan --force-download
Newest version of emacs-cmake-mode on remote site is 3.31.4, local version is 3.31.2
(mangled local version is 3.31.2)
=> Newer package available from:
=> https://cmake.org/files/LatestRelease/cmake-3.31.4.tar.gz
uscan warn: No files matched excluded pattern as the last matching glob: *.config
Successfully repacked ../emacs-cmake-mode-3.31.4.tar.gz as ../emacs-cmake-mode_3.31.4+ds.orig.tar.xz, deleting 28650 files from it.
5. Build Twice (build source after successful build [1]: Good
6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good
7. Install [No previous installs]: Good
8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: Good
Summary...
Xiyue, Looks good, just some issue with watch excludes to look at.
This has been marked 'yes' for sponsorship without an RFS. If there is no sponsor could you file an RFS so we can get it in front of DDs.
Please try the below on your packages...
[1] pbuilder:
* Command for 1.: sudo pbuilder build <PACKAGE>.dsc
* Command for 5.: sudo pbuilder build --twice <PACKAGE>.dsc
* Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto.
* Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks
[2] sbuild:
* Command: sbuild -d unstable <PACKAGE>.dsc
* Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild
[3] lintian:
* Command: lintian --display-info --verbose --fail-on error --info --pedantic --show-overrides (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough.
* Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian
[4] lrc:
* Command: lrc
* Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon
Note: Please report false positives as bug reports against 'licenserecon'.
[5] reprotest
* Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto-build <PACKAGE>.dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild
* Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article00000004
* Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/
* Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method
Regards
Phil
Needs work
Phil Wyett at Jan. 16, 2025, 11:38 p.m.
-
Hi Phil,
It looks like Sean close the RFS bug#1089572 but I didn't get the mail (again :( ). I've reopened and updated the bug with more info and hoping Sean may reconsider. Meanwhile also uploaded the newer version. PTAL.
Xiyue Deng at Jan. 17, 2025, 1:41 a.m.
